Sheraton Park Tower - London, United Kingdom 

"Sheraton Park Tower Hotel is adequate "
Posted: Mon, Nov 23 2009
Sheraton Park Tower Hotel's strengths bathrooms were modern and adequate. Sheraton Park Tower Hotel is adequate but should not be part of the starwood luxury collection. Alvaro, Liege

Should've stayed at the Four Seasons instead
Posted: Mon, Nov 05 2007
Sheraton Park Tower is extremely overrated. Frankly I find it quite ridiculous that it's part of the Starwood Luxury Collection. I've spent 2 weeks at this hotel and there was absolutely no luxury in accomodation nor service what so ever. For the rate of ?400/ night and for 2 weeks I expect superior service and accomodation. Anyone willing to pay this rate should seriously consider staying at the Four Seasons or The Dorchester. Having said that, the rooms were decent and well furnished. The beds were comfortable, and the windows were large letting in plenty of light in additition to a partial view of the Hyde Park . The bathrooms were dated and in need of new fittings, the sink drain and shower heads need to be replaced. The room service was mediocre at best and the food at the restaurants was disappointing. The staff were unattentive and frustrating, and there was practically no lobby, so to speak. I can understand this kind of service and overall experience from a lower class hotel but definitely not a Luxury Collection hotel. The best thing going for the Sheraton Park Tower is its location, and it proximity to Harrods and the Hyde Park.

Great Location, A Little Tired
Posted: Thu, Nov 01 2007
The Sheraton Towers is in a fantastic location, easy walking to Harrods, Buckingham Palace & most of the big attractions. Service is o.k., but rooms are a little tired. No view to speak of from our room but not sure whether this applied to all rooms. Beds were a little harder than I'm used to sleeping in at Sheraton hotels too.