King Solomon Hotel - London, United Kingdom 

PB
Posted: Wed, Dec 19 2007
Las habitaciones necesitan una reforma urgente, huelen a rancio, mobiliario viejo y deteriorado, plato ducha sucio, toallas color amarillento, televisi?n sobre el cabezal de la cama y sin mando a distancia. No hay conexi?n a internet como dice la web. No hay enchufe en el cuarto de ba?o. La atenci?n en recepci?n es bastante pobre. Desayuno aceptable aunque repetitivo. Lo mejor del hotel es la tranquilidad de la zona que, aunque algo lejana del centro de Londres, est? a diez minutos de la parada del metro. No lo recomendamos bajo ning?n concepto.

nice and friendly
Posted: Wed, Dec 19 2007
stayed with my family for a week and enjoyed it very clean and staff very help full will stay there again

AH
Posted: Sun, Dec 16 2007
I'm sure that this hotel has better rooms available at a higher price. Unfortunately, for £42 per night, this is about what one can expect these days in London. The neighbourhood is safe and charming. Aside from that, when I came to my room, a caulking gun was laying on the floor in front of the door. The room was minimally furnished, with a horrible smell from the plumbing and/or paint. The furniture was unfinished and unattractive, the remote control for the television was nowhere to be found and the telephone was unplugged and shoved in a drawer. But... for London in 2007, when your objective is not to stay in the room anyway, you can't beat £42 for a room with a shower and toilet en suite. Anywhere else, this room would sensibly be worth about £10-15 with breakfast inclusive. If travelling alone, I would stay there again. I would not bring my wife to this hotel unless I was certain that I was getting a much better room.

MU
Posted: Tue, Dec 11 2007
As we were looking for some cheap hotel in london, we found king solomon hotel a quite nice place to stay according to its price. however, our room was not as good as expected, we had a window leaning to the hallway (which we had to cover with a blanket), and the room was quite noisy. plus, it was a bit farther to undergournd than said in the web. with all, this hotel is a nice place to stay if you don't expect quite much about it, and its relationship price/quality is good.

AH
Posted: Tue, Dec 04 2007
I'm sure that this hotel has better rooms available at a higher price. Unfortunately, for ?42 per night, this is about what one can expect these days in London. The neighbourhood is safe and charming. Aside from that, when I came to my room, a caulking gun was laying on the floor in front of the door. The room was minimally furnished, with a horrible smell from the plumbing and/or paint. The furniture was unfinished and unattractive, the remote control for the television was nowhere to be found and the telephone was unplugged and shoved in a drawer. But... for London in 2007, when your objective is not to stay in the room anyway, you can't beat ?42 for a room with a shower and toilet en suite. Anywhere else, this room would sensibly be worth about ?10-15 with breakfast inclusive. If travelling alone, I would stay there again. I would not bring my wife to this hotel unless I was certain that I was getting a much better room.